Here is the syllabus for the most recent version of my graduate course, Using Technology in the Language Arts Classroom, a course required for the M.A.T. and M.Ed. here at Fayetteville State (I’ll post a link to the course website later). Teaching (and then reworking) this course has pushed me to think a little more carefully each time I’ve taught it about the needs of K-12 educators, an approach that I hope is somewhat reflected in the most recent version of the course. Luckily I’ve had the opportunity to learn from others who have taught similar courses or who have created syllabi that touch on similar issues of digital production. Laura’s syllabus for her Instructional Communications course was especially helpful, as was David Silver’s Digital Media Production syllabus. With that in mind, here is my syllabus below the fold:
Course Description: The course will provide students with the ability to use emerging technologies, especially the computer and the videodisc, to enhance the language arts classroom. Word processing and composition; the use of style checkers and editing programs, computer-assisted and computer-managed instruction, the electronic bulletin board, and video discs will be examined in the light of recent research into their effectiveness as pedagogical tools Students will design and implement syllabi for a computer intensive language arts course.
In many ways, English 518 will function as a “workshop course.” In order to complete the stated objectives of the course, we will be authoring texts and communicating within a variety of digital formats, including blogs and wikis. We will also communicate via Twitter and may experiment with other online services as well. All of the products we will be using in class, including Blogger and PBwiki, have free versions. As we communicate via these technologies, we will also theorize their effectiveness as tools for managing a classroom, as well as for communicating with other scholars and teachers. In addition, we will treat English 518 as a “hybrid course,” which means that we will combine in-class meetings with online “meetings.”
Textbooks: All of our readings will be available online or on library reserves.
Attendance Requirements: Like all graduate-level courses, your consistent attendance and participation is important. I realize that you may face extenuating circumstances that will cause you to miss class. If you know in advance that you will likely miss class, be sure to let me know, preferably by email so that I can provide you with information about any upcoming assignments. Because many of our meetings will take place online, you must participate in the online activities in order to make your presence felt in the class.
Graded Assignments: In order to gain an understanding of digital media work, it is important to gain some practice in how to use them. To that end, I will require you to participate in several different online compositions. These projects will range from the creation of a small wiki about topics pertaining to media and technology studies, blog entries about course readings, and Google Map mashups that might tell us something about our community.
This may require developing an understanding of other kinds of online texts and tools. To build the wiki, we may find that we want to include non-written texts, such as photographs and video, which may also include learning how to use sites such as Flickr and YouTube. If we decide that it will be beneficial, we can also choose to incorporate workshops that will help us better understand how to use the technologies that are available to us.
Class Participation: (15%) As might be expected in a seminar class, you should always be prepared to discuss assigned readings, whether via online discussions or during our monthly meetings. In fact, because the course will be a “hybrid” class, much your participation will take place online. Although you may be unfamiliar with many of the technologies we try out, you will be rewarded for at least trying out the tools addressed in this course. Your class participation grade will be determined not only by the quantity of your responses but also by the quality. Class participation also includes contributing to Twitter, delicious, Google maps, and commenting on your classmates’ blog posts. You should comment on at least two classmates’ posts per week.
Blog: (20%) Blogs have increasingly become an important tool in managing classes and in facilitating discussion. To that end, I will require that you post one substantial response blog entry per week of at least 250 words and to post at least one “link and comment” post per week where you find an online text related to course materials and comment on it in a brief blog post. Link and comment posts can be shorter than regular posts but should do more than merely link to the text that you have found. Tell us why it’s important and why your audience should pay attention to it.
Wiki: (15%) You will also be responsible for the production of a small wiki space about topics related to course themes connected to media studies, digital media tools, and K-12 education (and beyond). This may include wiki entries on different technologies, practices, and/or authors who address issues related to technology and education. You will be required to write five substantial wiki entries (250 words) over the course of the semester and to work with other classmates on editing theirs. I will temporarily close the wiki to new edits on April 21, 2009 in order to assess your work on it, so all entries should be completed by that time.
Final Project: (50%) The final project is a “big” project that we will define differently for each student. It should involve a significant written text, but it can also be supplemented with other visual materials. It can be written on paper or produced online using whatever digital tools you see fit. It can be a series of lesson plans (with brief annotations or explanations offering a rationale for class activities, etc). Or it can be a long paper on a topic pertinent to the course. Are course management systems such as Blackboard effective tools? How do they “construct” the experience between teacher and student? What role should technology play in the classroom? Any question you want to consider is fair game. Part of your final grade will involve presenting your conclusions to the class in our interactive, verbal final exam (more details on that coming soon). Papers are due April 28, 2009. I will return papers by the final exam period.
Course Outline and Assignments:
January 13: Introduction to English 518
Technology Overview: Blogging, Twitter, and wikis
Watch: “A Vision of K-12 Students Today,” YouTube.
View: “A Day in the Internet,” OnlineEducation.net
January 20: Blogging and Fandom
Media Tool: Blogger
Watch: Common Craft, “Protecting Reputations Online in Plain English.”
Fitzpatrick, Kathleen, “The Literary Machine: Blogging the Literature Course,” OL (PDF).
Jenkins, Henry. “Why Heather Can Write,” Technology Review (February 6, 2004). OL.
Rettberg, Jill Walker. “From Bards to Blogs,” Blogging. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2008, LR.
Tryon, Chuck, “Writing and Citizenship,” Pedagogy 6.1 (Winter 2006): 128-32. LR.
January 27: Twitter
Media Tool: Twitter
View: Twenty Two Interesting Ways to Use Twitter in the Classroom, OL.
Thompson, Clive, “Brave New World of Digital Intimacy,” New York Times, OL.
Johnson, Steven, “How Twitter Will Change the Way We Live,” Time, OL.
Heffernan, Virginia, “Hashing Things Out,” New York Times, OL.
boyd, danah, “Teens Don’t Tweet… or Do They?” apophenia, OL.
February 3: Wikipedia/Wikis
Media tools: Wikipedia, pbWiki
Cummings, Robert, “Are We Ready to Use Wikipedia to Teach Writing?” Inside Higher Ed, OL.
Mackey, Robert, “Wikipedia’s Rapid Reaction to Outburst During Obama’s Speech,” New York Times, OL.
Parry, David. “Wikipedia and the New Curriculum.” Science Progress, February 11, 2008. OL.
Terdiman, Daniel, “Study: Wikipedia as Accurate as Britannica,” CNET News, OL.
Tryon, Chuck, “Wikipedia Discussion Project,” The Chutry Experiment, OL.
February 10: RSS Feeds, Social Bookmarking, Link Shorteners, and Web Research Part I
Media Tools: Delicious, Google Reader, Diigo.
Watch: Common Craft, “Social Bookmarking in Plain English,” YouTube.
Lomas, Cyprien, “7 Things You Should Know about Social Bookmarking,” Educause, OL.
DesRoches, Donna, “Social Bookmarking Offers a New way to Store and Share Web Sites,” School Library Journal, OL.
February 17: Web Research Part II
Media Tools: Google Search
Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic. July/August 2008, OL.
Rich, Motoko, “In Web Age, Library Job Gets Update,” New York Times, OL.
Guess, Andy, “Research Methods Beyond Google,” Inside Higher Ed, OL.
February 24: Document Design, Grading Online
Media Tools: Open Office, Google Docs, GradeMark, Zamzar
Watch: Common Craft, “Google Docs in Plain English.”
O’Shea, Kevin, et al, “Google Docs,” Purdue University Technologies for Teaching and Learning, OL.
Houston, Natalie, “Paperless Grading with GradeMark,” ProfHacker.
Slobogin, Kathy, “Survey: Many Students Say Cheating’s OK,” CNN.com.
March 3: Course Management Systems
Media Tools: Blackboard, Moodle, email.
boyd, danah, “What I Mean when I Say ‘Email is Dead,’” apophenia, OL.
Lane, Lisa, “Toolbox or Trap? Course Management Systems and Pedagogy.” Educause Quarterly Magazine 31.2 (April-June 2006). OL.
Dabbagh, Nada, “Using a Web-Based CMT to Support Face-to-Face Instruction,” The Technology Source Archives, OL.
March 10: Spring Break
March 17: Google Maps
Media Tool: Google Maps
Grover, Shuchi, “Map Your World: Google Maps in the Classroom,” OL.
Kreutz, Christian, “Maptivism: Maps for Activism, Transparency, and Engagement,” OL.
Pantazes, Tom, “Using Google Earth in the Social Studies Classroom,” Conexions, OL.
March 24: Wireless
Media Tools: iPod Touch
Fang, Berlin, “From Distraction to Engagement: Wireless Devices in the Classroom,” Educause Quarterly, OL.
Ojeda-Zapata, Julio, “iPods and Educational Applications,” Twin Cities.com
Students are responsible for generating information about local and/or national policies on technology use in K-12 classrooms.
March 31: Facebook
Media Tool: Facebook
boyd, danah, “Cyberbullying,” apophenia, OL.
Internet Safety Technical Task Force, “Enhancing Child Safety & Online Technologies” (executive summary), OL.
Oppenheimer, Eilsabeth, “Citizens of Farmville,” The Future of the Internet Blog, OL.
Singel, Ryan, “Rogue Marketers Can Mine Your Info on Facebook,” Wired.com, OL.
Raynes-Goldie, Kate, “Aliases, Creeping, and Wall-Cleaning,” First Monday 15.1 (January 2010), OL.
April 7: Photography
Media Tools: Flickr
Baird, Derek E., “The Promise of Social Networks,” Tech and Learning, OL.
Jakes, David, “Classroom Uses of Flickr,” OL.
Standen, Amy, “My Friend Flickr: A Great Photo Opportunity,” Edutopia, OL.
April 14: Video Games/Media Effects
Media Tools: Darfur is Dying, Gotham Gazette, etc.
Bogost, Ian, “Videogames and the Future of Education,” Beyond Fun: Serious Games and Media, OL.
Gee, James Paul, “Good Video Games and Good Learning,” OL.
Robinson, Gail, “How Gotham Gazette Used Games as Storytelling Devices,” MediaShift, OL.
April 21: Podcasting and Video
Media Tools: Podcasting, PowerPoint
Case Study: Mapping Main Street
Teachers Teaching Teachers, “Radio Rookies Finding Where Their Passions Make Good Stories,” OL.
Tufte, Edward, “PowerPoint is Evil,” Wired 11.09 (2003), OL.
Ito, Mizuko, et al, Living and Learning with New Media, Part 1, pp, 19-42, OL.
April 28: New Directions
Parry, David, “Teaching in the Age of Distraction,” Academhack, OL.
Jenkins, Henry, et al, “Inside the Computer Clubhouse,” (3 parts) Confessions of an Aca/Fan, OL.
Ito, Mizuko, et al, Living and Learning, Part 3, 73-84, OL.